State_-02.png

AZ

  • Beginning in 2019, patients can submit bills to an “informal” review process.
  • If not resolved, then binding arbitration between the provider and the health insurer is the next step.
  • Only bills of at least $1,000 for services provided at a hospital that is typically in-network for the insurer are eligible for review.

State_-03.png

CA

  • Currently prohibited for emergency services under DMHC-administered plans
  • Also prohibits non-emergency “surprise bills". Consumers can only be billed for their in-network cost-sharing, when they use an in-network facility.

(https://dmhc.ca.gov/Portals/0/HealthCareInCalifornia/FactSheets/fsab72.pdf)


State_-05.png

CO

  • Prohibits emergency and surprise billing situations when consumers are treated at in-network facilities and referrals for inadequate network situations. (Colo. Rev. Stat. §10-16-704(3)(b))

State_-06.png

CT

  • Prohibits balance billing enrollees of managed care plans.
  • Prohibits reporting to a credit reporting agency an enrollee’s failure to pay a bill for medical services when a managed care organization has primary responsibility for payment. (8 Conn. Gen. Stat. § 20-7f.

State_-09.png

FL

  • Limits reimbursement for out-of-network emergency care by HMOs and PPOs to the lesser of the provider’s charges. (Fla. Stat. Ann. §641.513.)
  • Protects patients who go to an in-network healthcare facility and inadvertently receive services from non-network providers by making the insurer solely liable for the payment of fees and the insured only liable for applicable copayments. (Fla. Stat. Ann. §627.64194(2).)
  • Prohibits “surprise billing” for nonemergency services provided in an in-network facility by a non-network provider. (Fla. Stat. Ann. §627.64194(3))

State_-04.png

IL

  • Provides protection for balance bills from out-of-network facility-based physician or other providers practicing in network hospitals or ambulatory surgery centers (215 ILCS 5/356z.3a(b) and (c).)

MD

  • Currently prohibited in emergency and surprise billing situations (MD. Code Ann. Health-Gen. §§19-710(p); 19-710.1 and 19-712.5.)
  • HMOs are required to hold consumers harmless for covered services by non-network providers and pay at the prescribed rates. (MD. Code Ann. Insurance §§14-205.2 and 14-205.3.)

State_-11.png

NJ

  • Currently prohibited in emergency, inadequate network, and surprise billing situations. ( N.J.A.C. 11:24-5)

State_-10.png

NY

  • Patients generally protected from owing more than their usual in-network cost sharing/copays for emergency services as long as the consumer assigns the provider’s claim to the insurer (N.Y. Fin. Services Law §§603 and 606.)
  • Also protected in non-emergent if no in-network providers available or if provider failed to provide proper disclosures

State_-08.png

TX

  • Currently restricted for HMO & EPO emergency services
  • In emergency or inadequate network situations, PPOs and EPOs are required to pay at least the usual and customary charge for services (28 Tex. Admin. Code 3.3708.)